https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332680 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties. Relying on a precedent, it determined that the services provided did not fall under cargo handling services but were akin to transportation of goods. The decision emphasized the importance of accurately classifying services for tax liability purposes and highlighted the value of precedent in resolving such disputes efficiently. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332680 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for duty and penalties. Relying on a precedent, it determined that the services provided did not fall under cargo handling services but were akin to transportation of goods. The decision emphasized the importance of accurately classifying services for tax liability purposes and highlighted the value of precedent in resolving such disputes efficiently. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332680