https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5132 The Supreme Court held that the remuneration received by a member of a Hindu undivided family from partnerships should not be considered as the income of the family if it is not linked to family investments. In this case, the remuneration received by the family member was based on personal qualifications and management acts, rather than family assets. Thus, the Court concluded that the remuneration should be treated as the individual's income and not that of the Hindu undivided family. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5132 The Supreme Court held that the remuneration received by a member of a Hindu undivided family from partnerships should not be considered as the income of the family if it is not linked to family investments. In this case, the remuneration received by the family member was based on personal qualifications and management acts, rather than family assets. Thus, the Court concluded that the remuneration should be treated as the individual's income and not that of the Hindu undivided family. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 06 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5132