<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 931 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee and its employees, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the inclusion of royalties in the assessable value was incorrect, the extended period of limitation was not invocable, and the confiscation-cum-penal provisions were unjustified. The appeals filed by Revenue were dismissed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 931 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee and its employees, setting aside the impugned order. It held that the inclusion of royalties in the assessable value was incorrect, the extended period of limitation was not invocable, and the confiscation-cum-penal provisions were unjustified. The appeals filed by Revenue were dismissed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>