<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 928 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332667</link>
    <description>A show cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962 before 08.04.2011 was invalid where the officer issuing it had not been assigned the functions of assessment or reassessment and was therefore not the proper officer under Section 2(34). The Tribunal applied the Delhi High Court&#039;s interpretation of Section 28(11) and held that the retrospective amendment did not cure this jurisdictional defect. On that basis, the consequent adjudication and appellate orders could not stand, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 928 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332667</link>
      <description>A show cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962 before 08.04.2011 was invalid where the officer issuing it had not been assigned the functions of assessment or reassessment and was therefore not the proper officer under Section 2(34). The Tribunal applied the Delhi High Court&#039;s interpretation of Section 28(11) and held that the retrospective amendment did not cure this jurisdictional defect. On that basis, the consequent adjudication and appellate orders could not stand, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>