https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332666 The Tribunal set aside the order of revocation and forfeiture, allowing the appeal. The appellant was found not involved in the misdeclaration by the exporter and acted within the scope of their duties as a Custom House Agent based on provided documents. Charges of violating Regulations 13(a), 13(d), and 13(n) were not substantiated, leading to the conclusion that the revocation order was unsustainable. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332666 The Tribunal set aside the order of revocation and forfeiture, allowing the appeal. The appellant was found not involved in the misdeclaration by the exporter and acted within the scope of their duties as a Custom House Agent based on provided documents. Charges of violating Regulations 13(a), 13(d), and 13(n) were not substantiated, leading to the conclusion that the revocation order was unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332666