<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5129</link>
    <description>A deduction for compensation and arbitration expenses paid on termination of a managing agency was not allowable because the assessee failed to prove that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for the company&#039;s business; the Tribunal&#039;s findings showed no proved business services by the managing agents, personal disputes among partner-families, and no nexus with day-to-day business management. The High Court also lacked jurisdiction to require a second statement of case on questions not contained in the statutory application, since reference jurisdiction is confined to questions of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order and properly specified in the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5129</link>
      <description>A deduction for compensation and arbitration expenses paid on termination of a managing agency was not allowable because the assessee failed to prove that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for the company&#039;s business; the Tribunal&#039;s findings showed no proved business services by the managing agents, personal disputes among partner-families, and no nexus with day-to-day business management. The High Court also lacked jurisdiction to require a second statement of case on questions not contained in the statutory application, since reference jurisdiction is confined to questions of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order and properly specified in the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>