<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</link>
    <description>Bail under the NDPS Act is subject to the mandatory twin conditions in Section 37: the Public Prosecutor must be heard, and the court must find reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit another offence while on bail. &quot;Reasonable grounds&quot; requires more than a prima facie view and denotes substantial probable cause. The High Court had not addressed these statutory restraints, and the record included a confessional statement under Section 67. Alleged non-supply of copies and passage of time could not override the statutory embargo. Bail granted on those grounds was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</link>
      <description>Bail under the NDPS Act is subject to the mandatory twin conditions in Section 37: the Public Prosecutor must be heard, and the court must find reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit another offence while on bail. &quot;Reasonable grounds&quot; requires more than a prima facie view and denotes substantial probable cause. The High Court had not addressed these statutory restraints, and the record included a confessional statement under Section 67. Alleged non-supply of copies and passage of time could not override the statutory embargo. Bail granted on those grounds was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>