<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</link>
    <description>The SC overturned the Bombay HC&#039;s decision granting bail to the respondent accused of NDPS Act violations. The HC had granted bail due to non-compliance with a Special Judge&#039;s order to supply documents. The SC emphasized the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which were not met. Consequently, the SC set aside the bail, directing the respondent to surrender immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 772 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</link>
      <description>The SC overturned the Bombay HC&#039;s decision granting bail to the respondent accused of NDPS Act violations. The HC had granted bail due to non-compliance with a Special Judge&#039;s order to supply documents. The SC emphasized the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which were not met. Consequently, the SC set aside the bail, directing the respondent to surrender immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>