<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332663</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the revision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of the evidence and observations provided. The dispute arose from a penalty imposed on the assessee for falsely claiming input tax credit related to purchases of iron and steel. The Court emphasized the importance of verifying submitted documents to determine the validity of the claim, noting that crucial evidence was overlooked by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332663</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the revision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the case for reconsideration in light of the evidence and observations provided. The dispute arose from a penalty imposed on the assessee for falsely claiming input tax credit related to purchases of iron and steel. The Court emphasized the importance of verifying submitted documents to determine the validity of the claim, noting that crucial evidence was overlooked by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>