<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332661</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was held inappropriate where the tax exemption claim turned on disputed facts about the SEZ co-developer&#039;s authorised operations, the approved services, and whether the residential development formed part of those operations. Because effective appellate remedies were available and the exemption issue required factual scrutiny, the writ court should not bypass the statutory appeal process. The petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332661</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order was held inappropriate where the tax exemption claim turned on disputed facts about the SEZ co-developer&#039;s authorised operations, the approved services, and whether the residential development formed part of those operations. Because effective appellate remedies were available and the exemption issue required factual scrutiny, the writ court should not bypass the statutory appeal process. The petition was therefore dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>