https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332660 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's decision to reject the petitioner's request for recalling witnesses for cross-examination in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court clarified that the guidelines for a summary trial procedure were not to be applied retrospectively to ongoing cases. It emphasized that evidence given pre-summoning could be considered post-summoning without recalling witnesses unless necessary. The High Court deemed the guidelines from a previous case as prospective and affirmed the Trial Court's decision, dismissing the petition and application. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:08:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332660 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's decision to reject the petitioner's request for recalling witnesses for cross-examination in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court clarified that the guidelines for a summary trial procedure were not to be applied retrospectively to ongoing cases. It emphasized that evidence given pre-summoning could be considered post-summoning without recalling witnesses unless necessary. The High Court deemed the guidelines from a previous case as prospective and affirmed the Trial Court's decision, dismissing the petition and application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332660