<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 918 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the gain from the sale of agricultural land was not taxable as it was situated beyond 8 KMs of the municipal limit. It remanded the issue of the disallowed F&amp;amp;O trading loss back to the AO for fresh investigation, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes due to lack of proper cross-verification by the AO. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 918 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the gain from the sale of agricultural land was not taxable as it was situated beyond 8 KMs of the municipal limit. It remanded the issue of the disallowed F&amp;amp;O trading loss back to the AO for fresh investigation, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes due to lack of proper cross-verification by the AO. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>