<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 915 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the advances received by the assessee were genuine trade advances, properly adjusted against subsequent sales, and therefore not taxable under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both found in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 915 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the advances received by the assessee were genuine trade advances, properly adjusted against subsequent sales, and therefore not taxable under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both found in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>