<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 913 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332652</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271AAA for undisclosed income derived from a compromise agreement. The Tribunal found the assessee fulfilled the conditions by admitting the income, specifying its source, and paying tax and interest. Emphasizing the need to substantiate undisclosed income, the Tribunal concluded the penalty was unwarranted, deleting it based on the assessee&#039;s compliance with the Act&#039;s requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 913 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332652</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271AAA for undisclosed income derived from a compromise agreement. The Tribunal found the assessee fulfilled the conditions by admitting the income, specifying its source, and paying tax and interest. Emphasizing the need to substantiate undisclosed income, the Tribunal concluded the penalty was unwarranted, deleting it based on the assessee&#039;s compliance with the Act&#039;s requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>