<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in three appeals concerning penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for AYs 1995-96, 2002-03, and 2004-05. The Tribunal held that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars or conceal income, emphasizing that making an unsustainable claim does not constitute providing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalties were deleted in all three cases, following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 906 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in three appeals concerning penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for AYs 1995-96, 2002-03, and 2004-05. The Tribunal held that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars or conceal income, emphasizing that making an unsustainable claim does not constitute providing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the penalties were deleted in all three cases, following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>