https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the order of the appellate bench of the Small Causes Court, which had ordered eviction and mesne profits. The respondents were directed to pay the costs of the appeals. The Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 and upheld the findings of the lower courts regarding the permanent nature of the tenant's constructions, leading to the forfeiture of tenancy. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:27:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the order of the appellate bench of the Small Causes Court, which had ordered eviction and mesne profits. The respondents were directed to pay the costs of the appeals. The Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 and upheld the findings of the lower courts regarding the permanent nature of the tenant's constructions, leading to the forfeiture of tenancy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549