https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549 Tenant-made lofts, cabins, pillars and allied constructions were treated as permanent structures because the courts found them substantial, durable, sufficiently annexed to the premises, and erected without the landlord's consent; that breach of tenancy conditions supported eviction. The Supreme Court also held that Article 227 does not permit appellate reappreciation of evidence: concurrent findings on whether the structures were permanent can be disturbed only if perverse, unsupported by evidence, or vitiated by legal error. As those findings were based on a correct application of the legal test and a possible view of the evidence, the High Court's interference was unsustainable and the eviction decree was restored. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:27:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549 Tenant-made lofts, cabins, pillars and allied constructions were treated as permanent structures because the courts found them substantial, durable, sufficiently annexed to the premises, and erected without the landlord's consent; that breach of tenancy conditions supported eviction. The Supreme Court also held that Article 227 does not permit appellate reappreciation of evidence: concurrent findings on whether the structures were permanent can be disturbed only if perverse, unsupported by evidence, or vitiated by legal error. As those findings were based on a correct application of the legal test and a possible view of the evidence, the High Court's interference was unsustainable and the eviction decree was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186549