<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186542</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to restore the Rent Controller&#039;s order in a case involving a commercial tenant in New Delhi. The tenant&#039;s willful default, false claims of rent payment, and lack of compliance led to the striking off of the defense. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial discretion based on fairness and legal principles, dismissing the appeals and quantifying costs at Rs. 10,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 601 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186542</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to restore the Rent Controller&#039;s order in a case involving a commercial tenant in New Delhi. The tenant&#039;s willful default, false claims of rent payment, and lack of compliance led to the striking off of the defense. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial discretion based on fairness and legal principles, dismissing the appeals and quantifying costs at Rs. 10,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>