<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 513 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186541</link>
    <description>Where disciplinary rules allow an enquiry to be dispensed with only on recorded satisfaction that it is not reasonably practicable, judicial review is confined to legality, rationality, procedural fairness, and mala fides; a court cannot simply substitute its own view, and a bare allegation of victimization is insufficient without particulars. On the relief question, established serious misconduct, loss of confidence, and the passage of time can justify ing reinstatement and full consequential benefits, with monetary compensation instead of further service relief where that better balances the competing interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 513 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186541</link>
      <description>Where disciplinary rules allow an enquiry to be dispensed with only on recorded satisfaction that it is not reasonably practicable, judicial review is confined to legality, rationality, procedural fairness, and mala fides; a court cannot simply substitute its own view, and a bare allegation of victimization is insufficient without particulars. On the relief question, established serious misconduct, loss of confidence, and the passage of time can justify ing reinstatement and full consequential benefits, with monetary compensation instead of further service relief where that better balances the competing interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>