https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186539 Residents of the affected locality had sufficient interest to challenge diversion of land reserved as a public park because they were directly affected by the loss of open space and environmental amenities. The conversion of park land into a civic amenity site and its allotment for a private hospital was invalid because the sanctioned scheme reserved the land for a park, any alteration had to be made only by the competent authority on an objective finding of statutory improvement, and general executive powers could not override that specific statutory scheme. The diversion was therefore held void and without jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:56:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186539 Residents of the affected locality had sufficient interest to challenge diversion of land reserved as a public park because they were directly affected by the loss of open space and environmental amenities. The conversion of park land into a civic amenity site and its allotment for a private hospital was invalid because the sanctioned scheme reserved the land for a park, any alteration had to be made only by the competent authority on an objective finding of statutory improvement, and general executive powers could not override that specific statutory scheme. The diversion was therefore held void and without jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186539