<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 64 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186529</link>
    <description>Rectification of an individual assessment to incorporate a partner&#039;s share determined on reassessment of the firm is permissible as correction of a mistake apparent on the record where statutory provision treats such omission or incorrect inclusion as an apparent mistake; notice is required only where rectification would enhance assessment or reduce a refund. On the facts the rectification aligned the individual&#039;s assessment with the finalized firm assessment and reduced the taxpayer&#039;s liability, so absence of antecedent notice did not vitiate the exercise of rectification power; an alternative revision remedy existed and no writ relief was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 64 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186529</link>
      <description>Rectification of an individual assessment to incorporate a partner&#039;s share determined on reassessment of the firm is permissible as correction of a mistake apparent on the record where statutory provision treats such omission or incorrect inclusion as an apparent mistake; notice is required only where rectification would enhance assessment or reduce a refund. On the facts the rectification aligned the individual&#039;s assessment with the finalized firm assessment and reduced the taxpayer&#039;s liability, so absence of antecedent notice did not vitiate the exercise of rectification power; an alternative revision remedy existed and no writ relief was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>