https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332634 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a proprietorship firm providing various services, including security agency services. The appellant's contention that services beyond security services were not taxable was accepted. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided non-taxable services for a significant period and rejected the demand for service tax on all services. Additionally, the inclusion of salaries and infrastructure expenses in the taxable value was disallowed based on established legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh adjudication to rework the service tax liability in accordance with the Tribunal's findings and legal precedents. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332634 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a proprietorship firm providing various services, including security agency services. The appellant's contention that services beyond security services were not taxable was accepted. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided non-taxable services for a significant period and rejected the demand for service tax on all services. Additionally, the inclusion of salaries and infrastructure expenses in the taxable value was disallowed based on established legal principles. The matter was remanded for a fresh adjudication to rework the service tax liability in accordance with the Tribunal's findings and legal precedents. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332634