<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 877 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332616</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the Respondent&#039;s preliminary objection on maintainability, allowing the case to proceed. Respondents were given four weeks to file replies, with the next hearing scheduled for 28th November 2016. The Court clarified that adjudication proceedings were not stayed, and the final order on the interest issue would depend on the petition&#039;s outcome. The application was disposed of, paving the way for future legal actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 877 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332616</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the Respondent&#039;s preliminary objection on maintainability, allowing the case to proceed. Respondents were given four weeks to file replies, with the next hearing scheduled for 28th November 2016. The Court clarified that adjudication proceedings were not stayed, and the final order on the interest issue would depend on the petition&#039;s outcome. The application was disposed of, paving the way for future legal actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>