<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 868 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332607</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s penalty of Rs. 4 lakh on the appellant for failing to obtain SCORES authentication and timely respond to investor complaints, as mandated by SEBI circulars. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and delays in redressing grievances, the tribunal found the penalty justified under Section 15C of the SEBI Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming SEBI&#039;s imposition of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 868 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332607</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld SEBI&#039;s penalty of Rs. 4 lakh on the appellant for failing to obtain SCORES authentication and timely respond to investor complaints, as mandated by SEBI circulars. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and delays in redressing grievances, the tribunal found the penalty justified under Section 15C of the SEBI Act. The appeal was dismissed, affirming SEBI&#039;s imposition of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>