https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332605 The High Court overturned the Trial Court's decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant proved that the dishonored cheques were issued for specific debts related to goods supplied, refuting the accused's claim of security deposits. The accused failed to provide evidence supporting their defense, leading to the High Court setting aside the Trial Court's judgment and scheduling a sentencing hearing, requiring the accused to appear in court on the next date. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:53:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332605 The High Court overturned the Trial Court's decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant proved that the dishonored cheques were issued for specific debts related to goods supplied, refuting the accused's claim of security deposits. The accused failed to provide evidence supporting their defense, leading to the High Court setting aside the Trial Court's judgment and scheduling a sentencing hearing, requiring the accused to appear in court on the next date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332605