<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5104</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has the authority to stay the recovery of penalties during the appeal process, as it is incidental to its appellate jurisdiction under section 254(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This power ensures the effectiveness of the Tribunal&#039;s appellate functions and prevents the appeal from becoming futile. The Court dismissed the appeal, with each party responsible for its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2022 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5104</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has the authority to stay the recovery of penalties during the appeal process, as it is incidental to its appellate jurisdiction under section 254(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This power ensures the effectiveness of the Tribunal&#039;s appellate functions and prevents the appeal from becoming futile. The Court dismissed the appeal, with each party responsible for its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>