<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 852 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act should be computed by adjusting losses from non-eligible units against profits of eligible units. This aligns with High Court decisions and Supreme Court rulings, establishing that Section 10B provides a deduction, not an exemption, and requires consideration of both profits and losses in computation. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, adhering to legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 852 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act should be computed by adjusting losses from non-eligible units against profits of eligible units. This aligns with High Court decisions and Supreme Court rulings, establishing that Section 10B provides a deduction, not an exemption, and requires consideration of both profits and losses in computation. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, adhering to legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>