<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1184 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186525</link>
    <description>Chapter XIX-A settlement proceedings are conducted in stages: at the initial stage, the Settlement Commission may only decide whether the application should be proceeded with, while disclosure and maintainability objections remain open for later consideration. The Commission is not required to finally adjudicate the merits of full and true disclosure or pending assessment objections at that point. Grievances about disclosure, maintainability, and earlier court orders may be raised before the Commission itself, so writ interference before completion of that stage is generally unwarranted. The interim stay was vacated and the court declined to interfere with the settlement proceedings at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:57:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1184 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186525</link>
      <description>Chapter XIX-A settlement proceedings are conducted in stages: at the initial stage, the Settlement Commission may only decide whether the application should be proceeded with, while disclosure and maintainability objections remain open for later consideration. The Commission is not required to finally adjudicate the merits of full and true disclosure or pending assessment objections at that point. Grievances about disclosure, maintainability, and earlier court orders may be raised before the Commission itself, so writ interference before completion of that stage is generally unwarranted. The interim stay was vacated and the court declined to interfere with the settlement proceedings at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>