https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186527 Where settlement applications had been admitted and the proceedings were still pending, the High Court declined to interfere at the interlocutory stage. It held that objections based on the Department's report could still be raised before the Settlement Commission, and the statutory settlement process should be allowed to continue in accordance with law. The Revenue was therefore left to pursue its grounds before the Commission, rather than obtain premature writ interference. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:57:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186527 Where settlement applications had been admitted and the proceedings were still pending, the High Court declined to interfere at the interlocutory stage. It held that objections based on the Department's report could still be raised before the Settlement Commission, and the statutory settlement process should be allowed to continue in accordance with law. The Revenue was therefore left to pursue its grounds before the Commission, rather than obtain premature writ interference. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186527