<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 692 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186516</link>
    <description>Where an appeal was pending with a stay petition, the Court directed the appellate authority to decide the stay application within one month of receiving a certified copy of the judgment. Pending that decision, coercive recovery of the balance income-tax demand was ordered to remain in abeyance. The ruling reflects that, when stay relief is pending before the appellate forum, recovery action may be restrained until the stay request is considered and decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 692 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186516</link>
      <description>Where an appeal was pending with a stay petition, the Court directed the appellate authority to decide the stay application within one month of receiving a certified copy of the judgment. Pending that decision, coercive recovery of the balance income-tax demand was ordered to remain in abeyance. The ruling reflects that, when stay relief is pending before the appellate forum, recovery action may be restrained until the stay request is considered and decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>