<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1234 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee, UPSRTC, was only obligated to deduct tax under section 194C, not 194-I, for payments to contractors as hire charges. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that hiring buses for passengers falls under 194C, not 194-I, based on specific provisions of the Income-tax Act and legal interpretations. The decision clarified the tax deduction requirements, emphasizing the distinction between the two sections and supported the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1234 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee, UPSRTC, was only obligated to deduct tax under section 194C, not 194-I, for payments to contractors as hire charges. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that hiring buses for passengers falls under 194C, not 194-I, based on specific provisions of the Income-tax Act and legal interpretations. The decision clarified the tax deduction requirements, emphasizing the distinction between the two sections and supported the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>