https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186506 In writ jurisdiction, delay is tested on the doctrine of laches, not by applying Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963; the High Court's dismissal on a condonation-style approach was therefore unjustified. On relief, where termination of a temporary employee arose from disciplinary allegations and further prolongation of the dispute was undesirable, reinstatement was held unsuitable and compensation was treated as an appropriate substitute. The Court interfered with the challenged order and substituted reinstatement with a lump-sum monetary award. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:22:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186506 In writ jurisdiction, delay is tested on the doctrine of laches, not by applying Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963; the High Court's dismissal on a condonation-style approach was therefore unjustified. On relief, where termination of a temporary employee arose from disciplinary allegations and further prolongation of the dispute was undesirable, reinstatement was held unsuitable and compensation was treated as an appropriate substitute. The Court interfered with the challenged order and substituted reinstatement with a lump-sum monetary award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186506