<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting modvat credit, as it was based on the decision in the Vikram Ispat case, which was not challenged by the department and deemed binding. The appeal lacked grounds for interference and was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting modvat credit, as it was based on the decision in the Vikram Ispat case, which was not challenged by the department and deemed binding. The appeal lacked grounds for interference and was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>