<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1122 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186496</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit validly taken on duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable final products cannot be reversed merely because the finished goods are later cleared without duty after the product becomes exempt. The HC applied the principle that the credit scheme does not require one-to-one correlation between inputs and final products, and in the absence of a specific rule mandating reversal, credit lawfully earned and utilised when the goods were dutiable remains intact. The revenue appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1122 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186496</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit validly taken on duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable final products cannot be reversed merely because the finished goods are later cleared without duty after the product becomes exempt. The HC applied the principle that the credit scheme does not require one-to-one correlation between inputs and final products, and in the absence of a specific rule mandating reversal, credit lawfully earned and utilised when the goods were dutiable remains intact. The revenue appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>