<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1002 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186490</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order directing the appellant to deposit the confirmed service tax amount, citing inconsistency among CESTAT members and a previous case precedent where unconditional leave for predeposit was granted. The High Court instructed the CESTAT to hear the appeal on merits without necessitating any predeposit, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1002 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186490</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order directing the appellant to deposit the confirmed service tax amount, citing inconsistency among CESTAT members and a previous case precedent where unconditional leave for predeposit was granted. The High Court instructed the CESTAT to hear the appeal on merits without necessitating any predeposit, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>