<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1420 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186489</link>
    <description>The appeal against the common order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-38, Mumbai for assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03 was dismissed. However, the appeal for the assessment year 2003-04 was allowed in part, and the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06 was allowed. The Tribunal sustained additions for the earlier years due to significant variations in withdrawals but found no merit in the revenue authorities&#039; conclusions for the assessment year 2003-04.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1420 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186489</link>
      <description>The appeal against the common order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-38, Mumbai for assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03 was dismissed. However, the appeal for the assessment year 2003-04 was allowed in part, and the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06 was allowed. The Tribunal sustained additions for the earlier years due to significant variations in withdrawals but found no merit in the revenue authorities&#039; conclusions for the assessment year 2003-04.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>