<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1103 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186487</link>
    <description>The appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act involved the inclusion of Excise Duty in the value of closing stock of raw material for Assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s position that excise duty should be excluded from closing stock valuation since it was already excluded from opening stock, leading to no difference in the overall result. The Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1103 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186487</link>
      <description>The appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act involved the inclusion of Excise Duty in the value of closing stock of raw material for Assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s position that excise duty should be excluded from closing stock valuation since it was already excluded from opening stock, leading to no difference in the overall result. The Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>