<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 652 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. It affirmed that steam qualifies as power for deduction under section 80IA, rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the computation of deduction from UPSEB receipts, upheld the inclusion of steam sale proceeds for deduction, and supported the disallowance of depreciation not claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the consistent application of legal principles and precedents in reaching its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:40:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 652 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. It affirmed that steam qualifies as power for deduction under section 80IA, rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding the computation of deduction from UPSEB receipts, upheld the inclusion of steam sale proceeds for deduction, and supported the disallowance of depreciation not claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the consistent application of legal principles and precedents in reaching its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>