<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 938 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186484</link>
    <description>A liquor vending licence is personal to the named licensee and cannot be treated as a transferable authorisation for a partnership firm carrying on the business. Because liquor trade remains subject to the doctrine of res extra commercium, participation by persons other than the licensee through a partnership arrangement amounts to unauthorised engagement in a regulated activity. The Karnataka HC note states that the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 938 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186484</link>
      <description>A liquor vending licence is personal to the named licensee and cannot be treated as a transferable authorisation for a partnership firm carrying on the business. Because liquor trade remains subject to the doctrine of res extra commercium, participation by persons other than the licensee through a partnership arrangement amounts to unauthorised engagement in a regulated activity. The Karnataka HC note states that the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>