https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332584 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand on the appellant, a real estate agent, for the period in question. The Tribunal determined that the appellant's activities focused on land development for a township rather than construction of residential complexes, aligning with a previous precedent that similar development work did not fall under the category of construction services of residential complex service. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:30:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332584 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand on the appellant, a real estate agent, for the period in question. The Tribunal determined that the appellant's activities focused on land development for a township rather than construction of residential complexes, aligning with a previous precedent that similar development work did not fall under the category of construction services of residential complex service. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332584