<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 843 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed tax liability on the labor portion of work but set aside demands under other heads. Penalties were waived, and previous rulings were cited to support the decision, emphasizing the correct application of tax laws and exclusions under the Finance Act. The appeals were disposed of with a detailed analysis of each tax demand component, considering statutory definitions, judicial precedents, and contractual agreements, ensuring a fair and legally sound decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 843 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed tax liability on the labor portion of work but set aside demands under other heads. Penalties were waived, and previous rulings were cited to support the decision, emphasizing the correct application of tax laws and exclusions under the Finance Act. The appeals were disposed of with a detailed analysis of each tax demand component, considering statutory definitions, judicial precedents, and contractual agreements, ensuring a fair and legally sound decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>