https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186471 The Court allowed the petitioner to deposit 7.5% of the duty amount within four weeks to maintain the stay order until the appeal is decided by CESTAT, despite the non-retrospective nature of Section 35F. This decision balanced statutory requirements with the practical challenges faced by the appellant, providing temporary relief while upholding post-appeal legal provisions. The Court's prompt issuance of certified copies emphasized its commitment to facilitating compliance and preserving the status quo during the appeal process. en-us Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186471 The Court allowed the petitioner to deposit 7.5% of the duty amount within four weeks to maintain the stay order until the appeal is decided by CESTAT, despite the non-retrospective nature of Section 35F. This decision balanced statutory requirements with the practical challenges faced by the appellant, providing temporary relief while upholding post-appeal legal provisions. The Court's prompt issuance of certified copies emphasized its commitment to facilitating compliance and preserving the status quo during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186471