https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186476 The Tribunal held that the appellant was liable to pay service tax for technical know-how received, making them an output service provider under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner (A) erred in not treating the appellant as such. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits, and the impugned orders were set aside. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186476 The Tribunal held that the appellant was liable to pay service tax for technical know-how received, making them an output service provider under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner (A) erred in not treating the appellant as such. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits, and the impugned orders were set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186476