https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332572 Where the Customs Act and the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations form a complete code, an aggrieved customs broker must ordinarily pursue the statutory appeal under Section 129A before CESTAT instead of invoking Article 226. The Court treated that appellate remedy as efficacious and comprehensive because it could examine both factual disputes and the sufficiency of evidence. Although it made prima facie observations that no ex facie illegality or breach of natural justice was apparent, it declined writ jurisdiction and found the petition not maintainable because an effective alternative remedy existed. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332572 Where the Customs Act and the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations form a complete code, an aggrieved customs broker must ordinarily pursue the statutory appeal under Section 129A before CESTAT instead of invoking Article 226. The Court treated that appellate remedy as efficacious and comprehensive because it could examine both factual disputes and the sufficiency of evidence. Although it made prima facie observations that no ex facie illegality or breach of natural justice was apparent, it declined writ jurisdiction and found the petition not maintainable because an effective alternative remedy existed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332572