<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 817 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332556</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) allowing settlement applications to proceed, finding no conclusive evidence of false information by the applicants. It emphasized that the ITSC&#039;s decision was not final and did not cause irreparable loss to the Income Tax Department. The court stressed the Settlement Commission&#039;s role in determining the adequacy of income disclosures and highlighted the procedural aspects and jurisdiction of the Commission in dealing with settlement applications. The writ petition was dismissed, directing the Settlement Commission to address all issues raised by the petitioner in accordance with statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 817 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332556</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) allowing settlement applications to proceed, finding no conclusive evidence of false information by the applicants. It emphasized that the ITSC&#039;s decision was not final and did not cause irreparable loss to the Income Tax Department. The court stressed the Settlement Commission&#039;s role in determining the adequacy of income disclosures and highlighted the procedural aspects and jurisdiction of the Commission in dealing with settlement applications. The writ petition was dismissed, directing the Settlement Commission to address all issues raised by the petitioner in accordance with statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>