<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 801 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332540</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the validity of the reopening but deleted the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act for a sale transaction involving shares, amounting to Rs. 45,51,396. The appellate authority found the transaction genuine, supported by evidence of long-term holding and capital gain, overturning the assessing officer&#039;s decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument for enhancing the assessment was dismissed, emphasizing fair scrutiny. The denial of cross-examination to the assessee raised concerns about natural justice principles, prompting a reexamination under sections 68 and 69 by the assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 801 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332540</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the validity of the reopening but deleted the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act for a sale transaction involving shares, amounting to Rs. 45,51,396. The appellate authority found the transaction genuine, supported by evidence of long-term holding and capital gain, overturning the assessing officer&#039;s decision. The Revenue&#039;s argument for enhancing the assessment was dismissed, emphasizing fair scrutiny. The denial of cross-examination to the assessee raised concerns about natural justice principles, prompting a reexamination under sections 68 and 69 by the assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>