<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 792 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Additional Commissioner for recalculation of interest on the actual amount due month-wise, rejecting the averaged calculation method. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the interest calculation and reduced penalty applicability was upheld, directing the Commissioner to consider documentary evidence and decide on the reduced penalty in line with the law. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings to ensure a fair resolution of the dispute regarding the recovery notice for arrears of service tax and related penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 792 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Additional Commissioner for recalculation of interest on the actual amount due month-wise, rejecting the averaged calculation method. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the interest calculation and reduced penalty applicability was upheld, directing the Commissioner to consider documentary evidence and decide on the reduced penalty in line with the law. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings to ensure a fair resolution of the dispute regarding the recovery notice for arrears of service tax and related penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>