<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 70 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186469</link>
    <description>A present and enforceable obligation to pay income-tax, including unpaid advance tax instalments, was treated as a &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act even though the amount might be quantified later, so the liability was deductible on the valuation date. For valuation under section 7(2)(a), depreciable assets shown in the balance-sheet were not required to be automatically substituted by written down value from income-tax records; such adjustment depends on the circumstances and the balance-sheet values are not to be disturbed mechanically. The assessee succeeded on the debt-deduction issue, while the Revenue succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:33:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 70 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186469</link>
      <description>A present and enforceable obligation to pay income-tax, including unpaid advance tax instalments, was treated as a &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act even though the amount might be quantified later, so the liability was deductible on the valuation date. For valuation under section 7(2)(a), depreciable assets shown in the balance-sheet were not required to be automatically substituted by written down value from income-tax records; such adjustment depends on the circumstances and the balance-sheet values are not to be disturbed mechanically. The assessee succeeded on the debt-deduction issue, while the Revenue succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>