<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issue to the Ld. CIT(A) to examine whether the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 was justified, given that no addition was made for the income escaping assessment for which the assessment was reopened. The Ld. CIT(A) was directed to pass a speaking order on this issue. Consequently, the addition made on merit was also set aside for fresh consideration by the CIT(A). The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:06:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1419 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issue to the Ld. CIT(A) to examine whether the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 was justified, given that no addition was made for the income escaping assessment for which the assessment was reopened. The Ld. CIT(A) was directed to pass a speaking order on this issue. Consequently, the addition made on merit was also set aside for fresh consideration by the CIT(A). The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>