https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332507 Disputed factual inconsistencies in the assessment orders, including the treatment of invoices and contractual arrangements, were held unsuitable for writ adjudication because they required verification of records and examination of the contractual scope. The availability of a statutory rectification mechanism under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 supported relegation to that remedy, and the assessing authority was directed to reconsider the matter after hearing the petitioner, examining the documents, and, if necessary, calling for further details before passing a speaking order. The writ petitions were therefore not entertained on merits. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:33:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332507 Disputed factual inconsistencies in the assessment orders, including the treatment of invoices and contractual arrangements, were held unsuitable for writ adjudication because they required verification of records and examination of the contractual scope. The availability of a statutory rectification mechanism under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 supported relegation to that remedy, and the assessing authority was directed to reconsider the matter after hearing the petitioner, examining the documents, and, if necessary, calling for further details before passing a speaking order. The writ petitions were therefore not entertained on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332507