<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332494</link>
    <description>An addition based solely on a survey statement was held unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s books and declared profit results broadly matched the estimated figure and no discrepancy or unaccounted income was found. The estimate given during survey was treated as an approximate projection, not as an admission of undisclosed income. In the absence of independent corroborative material, the statement alone could not justify the addition. The assessee&#039;s later explanation regarding partner remuneration was also consistent with the survey estimate and remained unrebutted. The addition was therefore deleted, with the matter decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332494</link>
      <description>An addition based solely on a survey statement was held unsustainable where the assessee&#039;s books and declared profit results broadly matched the estimated figure and no discrepancy or unaccounted income was found. The estimate given during survey was treated as an approximate projection, not as an admission of undisclosed income. In the absence of independent corroborative material, the statement alone could not justify the addition. The assessee&#039;s later explanation regarding partner remuneration was also consistent with the survey estimate and remained unrebutted. The addition was therefore deleted, with the matter decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>