<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 745 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were beyond the scope of Section 153A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of unexplained investment in share application money under section 68, as it was not supported by any seized material or evidence, following legal precedents set by the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=441549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 745 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were beyond the scope of Section 153A of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of unexplained investment in share application money under section 68, as it was not supported by any seized material or evidence, following legal precedents set by the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>